|
|
Home Page |
History |
Products |
Services |
Writing |
Co-ventures | |
This is a summary of results from several measures of creativity which I took over a period of a year. The results are impressive, and each is interpreted for you in the sections below. All of these tests were administered Dr. Grove, who is currently conducting research in creativity. These are the measures I have used:
The Creativity Assessment Packet by Frank Williams, Ph.D,
The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking by E. Paul Torrance, Ed.D.
The PYTHAGORAS B/C by Greg A. Grove, Ph.D.
The Wechsler Abreviated Scale of Intelligence,WASI by David Wechsler, Ph.D.
The Luscher Color Test by Max Luscher, Ph.D.
The Preconscious Activity Scale by John L. Holland, Ph.D., and Leonard L. Baird, Ph.D.
The Creativity
Assessment Packet
by Frank Williams, Ph.D. (1980, 1993)
The Williams Scale
a) Curiosity 93
b) Imagination
c) Complexity
d) Risk-Taking
e) Total
50
50
98
84
In the areas of imagination and complexity I have scores in
the fifty percentile ranges. One may infer that my ideas
will not be average in complexity. I believe in simplicity.
Just as an average measure of imagination foretells that the
ideas themselves may not be far from what the average person
might understand.
On the other hand the score of 93 in the curiosity measure
shows that I am quite curious. I do want to know "why" and
am capable of speculating, theorizing, and bringing in a
wide range of perspectives to a creativity session. The 98
scored on the risk taking measure demonstrates that I do not
let preconditions, or assumptions rest untested. I am
willing to consider any possibility or reconsider them once
they have been rethought. Why leave any line of thought
untouched, unquestioned?
Exercise in Divergent Thinking (Form A)
by Frank Williams, Ph.D. (1991)
This is an observation screen. Dan scored 78 out of 100
points, which places him in the superior range of divergent
thinking and feeling as these relate to creativity. This
score is equivalent to the 92nd percentile based on group
norms. This test revealed extremely high performance scores
through a combination of verbal left-brain abilities
(titles), along with non-verbal right-brain visual
perceptive abilities (drawings).
Then, looking at the measures for Fluency you see scores
also in the 98th percentile. I feel that this measures one's
ability to form ideas along a line of thought, that proceed
from one to the another with a logic all their own. Elaboration is a measure expanding on a single idea to
create others. Often times it is not the idea itself, or
even the question or problem that I am posed with that
ultimately provides an solution, or resolution, but rather
the ruminations upon particular parts of an idea or by
changing one aspect of an idea and speculating on how this
single change would have a ripple effect on other aspects of
the problem at hand.
Creative Thinking
a) Fluency
b) Flexibility
c) Originality
d) Elaboration
e) Total
Form A
98 percentile
98 percentile
97 percentile
98 percentile
97 percentile
Form B
98 percentile
50 percentile
98 percentile
93 percentile
84 percentile
In these results, what stands out most are the measures for
Originality, both in the high nineties percentile range.
This is quite remarkable and means that I can come up with
ideas, lots of them. It almost goes without saying that they
will be new and unique.
Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking
Verbal Form A
by E. Paul Torrance, Ed.D. (1966, 1993) a) Fluency 96 percentile The Torrance measures, to a great extent agree with the
measures on the Williams Scale. I feel that this adds some
verity to the idea that I have a creative ability that is
unusually high. The overall Creativity Index is quite high. If this is a
measure of where I score relative to the population as a
whole, then I am as creative as the 5% most creative
people.
b) Flexibility
c) Originality
d) Average
e) Creativity Index
86 percentile
98 percentile
97 percentile
95 percentile
Figural Form A
by E. Paul Torrance, Ed.D. (1962) a) Fluency 65 percentile Originality and Elaboration have been touched on before
in other tests, these scores simply validate them. For those
in advertising or public relations the scoring for
Abstractness of Titles might be interesting. For those with
pressing problems my scoring for Resistance to Closure might
tell you that I am persistent, unwilling to simply give up
when I am seeking a creative solution to a problem. On this
measure I am average in Fluency, a result at variance with
similarly titled measures on the Torrance, Verbal Form A,
and that of the Williams Scale. Those tests measure verbal
abilities, this one is based on figures drawn during the
test. Perhaps then I am not a great artist. But then we are
talking about finding creative solutions to your
concerns.
b) Originality
c) Elaboration
d) Abstractness of Titles
e) Resistance to Closure
f) Average
90 percentile
99 percentile
92 percentile
87 percentile
98 percentile
Experimental Measures of Verbal and Nonverbal Creativity
by Greg A. Grove, Ph.D. (1999)
Dan was administered both forms of the Pythagoras. The
WASI was administered between the Pythagoras tests to
control and reduce any practice effects. Dan also took the
Luscher Color Test, and the Preconcious Activity Scale,
their results, as well as that of the WASI, are included
after those of the PYTHAGORAS B and C. The Conceptual Insight subtest pertains to verbal
concepts. Dan determined whether two words were similar or
opposite in meaning. This subtest is timed, and speed and
accuracy are critical to getting a high score. Dan's average
T-score for this subtest is 72.5, the 99th percentile. His
performance on Form B most nearly equates to his WASI Verbal
IQ at the 96th percentile. From the results of this subtest,
Dan demonstrated an excellent command of reading vocabulary
and verbal reasoning, which could readily out-picture itself
in handling the demands of creative verbal expression
through writing. The Personality Disposition subtest is composed of two
parts. Interests and Activities measures breadth and depth
of various academic, vocational, and recreational endeavors,
whereas Character Development measures personality from an
array of positive traits. Above average scores typify the
"nonconformist," whereas low scores typify the "conformist."
Dan's T-score on the Interests and Activities portion
suggests High Average depth and breath at the 73rd
percentile. His average T-score on the Character Development
portion profiles the creative, nonconformist at the 96th
percentile. Based on these results, Dan possesses the
intensive focus and nonconforming behavior that typifies a
highly creative and diverse disposition. The Creative Imitation subtest allows the examinee an
opportunity to modify and personalize a generic figure
common to nearly every culture. The test is timed and scored
on the basis of fluency (speed of performance), persistence,
style of performance (trail-and-error or synthesis),
aesthetic quality, and imagination. To attain a high score
the examinee must work quickly and exhibit creativity that
produces a new figure of same type but with greater depth of
uniqueness. Dan's performance at the 99.1 percentile on both
forms of the Pythagoras suggests that he is extremely
capable of taking an existing idea and modifying it to
produce a "better mousetrap." The Original Production subtest provides the examinee
with an opportunity to create his own figure, design, or
object using up to 9 geometric shapes. There are two trials.
The first uses the shapes without color and the second uses
the same shapes but with 2 choices of color per shape. The
addition of color generally appeals to the examinee and adds
another dimension to the creative act Dan's performance at
the 99.1 percentile on both forms suggests that he excels in
the area of visual-perception organization and synthesis.
Dan's extremely high 99.1 percentile on this test reflects
his High Average to Superior Block Design and Matrix
Reasoning scores on the WASI. Dr. Greg A. Grove Certified Educational Therapist
Form B
Classification Conceptual Insight 67 Percentiles 96.0 These measures provide a description of some fundamental
creative measures. They describe a person who can extend
existing ideas, eventually altering or wholly changing them
into something new. However in Verbal Interpretation I am
average. This portends an ability to speak in simpler ways
when explaining myself, in other words, I can make myself
understood. The average score in Original Production is only
apparently at variance with similar measures on other tests.
However, the PYTHAGORAS B uses simple geometrical shapes, in
part, and so may well have complexity as a component in its
scoring. I interpret this to mean that my ideas are not more
complex than those of most persons, meaning, possibly, that
I may have a talent for finding simple solutions. The results from the Form C, a test quite similar to that
of Form B, provides similar results.
Personality Disposition
Creative Imitation
Original Production
Composite
63
73
73
69
90.0
99.1
99.1
97.0
Form C
Descriptors
Conceptual Insight
Personality Disposition
Creative Imitation
Original Production
Composite
78
61
73
73
71
99.7
86.0
99.1
99.1
98.0
Gifted......
......
High Average..
Very Creative..
Very Creative..
Very Creative..
The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)
by David Wechsler, Ph. D. 1999
This is a brief clinically-administered test of
cognitive functioning
that correlates well with the Wechsler Adult
Intelligence Test-III (WAIS-III).
Vocabulary Verbal IQ Predicted Full-Scale WAIS-III IQ: 116-139 at the 90%
confidence interval, with a mean IQ of 129, the 97th
percentile.
Similarities Design
Block Design
Matrix Reasoning
66
64
61
69
95
92
86
97
Dan's results on both the verbal and non-verbal sections of
the WASI demonstrated superior performance. His overall
cognitive functioning places him in the upper 3 percent of
the norming population. Individuals scoring this high many
times exhibit those personality traits associated with
mentally gifted individuals.
Performance IQ
Full Scale IQ
68
69
96
97
by Max Luscher, Ph.D. (1948, 1969 )
The brief Color Test was administered to determine Dan's
overall psycho-physiological state at the time of the
testing. His overall score revealed no extreme levels of
anxiety or personality dysfunction but rather an openness to
experience new ideas and to disclose himself freely and
openly to the examiner.
The Preconscious Activity Scale
by John L. Holland, Ph.D. and Leonard L. Baird, Ph.D. (1968)
Raw Score: 26 Male College Norms: Percentile 96 This brief screen for creativity consisted of 38
questions to which Dan responded "yes" or "no." The Scale is
based on the theory that creative individuals have greater
access to their subconscious mind from which to accesses
divergent thoughts and feelings. Dan's score places him in
the upper 4 percent of the male population and suggests
excellent creativity functioning.